Goldcorp Reports Fourth Quarter 2015 Results; Provides Updated Reserves and Resources Estimates and 2016 Guidance
In the fourth quarter of 2015, adjusted operating cash flow was \\$339 million, or
For the full year 2015, the Company recorded a net loss of
Highlights
- Achieved guidance resulting in strong free cash flow. Record 2015 production of 3.46 million ounces and all-in sustaining costs1,5 of
\\$852 per ounce (excluding inventory impairments), (\\$894 per ounce including inventory impairments) achieved guidance; strong operating results led to 2015 free cash flow of\\$335 million . - Continued focus on increasing quality of reserves with higher grade, higher margin ounces. Proven and probable gold reserves decreased by 18% to approximately 41 million ounces but reflect a 13% increase in average reserve grade to 1.06g/t. Reserves were calculated using a long-term gold price of
\\$1,100 per ounce and conservative foreign exchange rate assumptions (see mineral reserve and resource table included below for additional information). An increase of\\$100 in the gold price would result in gold reserves increasing by approximately 2 million ounces. The decrease in reserves were driven by 5.3 million ounces of low margin reserves being reclassified to resource at Los Filos and 1.8 million ounces at the new Project Corridor venture being replaced by an increase in copper reserves.Goldcorp's overall gold equivalent reserves increased by over 2% to 85.6 million ounces. - Stable three year production and cost forecast reflecting focus on cash margins rather than ounces. Excluding organic growth projects, annual gold production guidance for the years 2016 to 2018 inclusive of between 2.8 million and 3.1 million ounces at total cash costs on a by-product basis1,6 of between
\\$500 and \\$575 per ounce and all-in sustaining costs of between\\$850 and \\$925 per ounce. - Robust internal pipeline of potential production growth over next five years. Brownfield expansion opportunities at Pe?asquito, Musselwhite,
Red Lake andPorcupine provide the potential for low capital intensity, low-risk and high rate of return growth over the next five years. - Declining capital expenditure profile and focused exploration program balance free cash flow generation with investment in replacing reserves. A planned decrease in capital expenditures reflects the completion of major construction and transition into lower capital intensity organic projects. The budgeted
\\$135 million exploration program will be largely targeted on expanding and upgrading the measured and indicated gold resource of 38 million ounces and the inferred gold resource of 18 million ounces at existing mines. - Quarterly dividend of
\\$0.02 per share commencingApril 1, 2016 . This lower, sustainable dividend level provides shareholders a competitive yield while allowingGoldcorp to continue to strengthen its industry-leading balance sheet and invest in its growth projects. Quarterly dividends will be paid onJune 24 ,September 23 , andDecember 23, 2016 .
"
Chuck Jeannes,
"In spite of a conservative long-term gold price assumption, our reserves were collectively unchanged at our Pe?asquito, Cerro Negro,
David Garofalo is the right person to lead
Financial Review – Key Metrics
(millions except where noted) |
Three months ended December 31 |
Year ended December 31 | ||
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 | |
Gold sales (ozs) |
918,100 |
707,900 |
3,591,200 |
2,672,800 |
Gold production (ozs) |
909,400 |
890,900 |
3,464,400 |
2,871,200 |
Adjusted operating cash flow |
\\$339 |
\\$337 |
\\$1,437 |
\\$1,393 |
Adjusted operating cash flow per share |
\\$0.41 |
\\$0.41 |
\\$1.73 |
\\$1.71 |
Free cash flow before dividends |
\\$239 |
(\\$241) |
\\$335 |
(\\$1,003) |
(millions except where noted) |
Three months ended December 31 |
Year ended December 31 | ||
Net loss |
(\\$4,271) |
(\\$2,396) |
(\\$4,157) |
(\\$2,159) |
Net loss per share |
(\\$5.14) |
(\\$2.94) |
(\\$5.03) |
(\\$2.66) |
All-in sustaining costs (per ounce) |
\\$977 |
\\$1,035 |
\\$894 |
\\$949 |
All-in sustaining costs (per ounce) excluding inventory impairments* |
\\$867 |
\\$992 |
\\$852 |
\\$922 |
By-product cash costs (per ounce)6 |
\\$687 |
\\$589 |
\\$605 |
\\$542 |
*Inventory impairments include Los Filos and Pe?asquito
During 2015,
Project Pipeline Provides Potential Gold Production Growth
Pe?asquito District:
The feasibility study for the Metallurgical Enhancement Process ("MEP") which consists of the Concentrate Enrichment Process ("CEP") and Pyrite Leach Plant ("PLP"), was completed during the fourth quarter. The results determined that the CEP component of the MEP no longer met the Company's required rates of return due to improved fundamentals in the concentrate smelting market. The PLP continues to demonstrate strong potential to recover gold and silver currently going to tailings. An investment decision on PLP is expected by mid-2016, which if approved, is expected to be in production by the end of 2018.
At Camino Rojo (100%-owned), located approximately 50 kilometres from Pe?asquito, an ongoing pre-feasibility study is evaluating Camino Rojo as a supplemental source of feed to the existing Pe?asquito facility. Updating of the geologic model continued during the fourth quarter of 2015. Metallurgical testing is ongoing. The pre-feasibility study is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2016.
Musselwhite Materials Handling:
A feasibility study is underway to invest capital in an underground Materials Handling System that would enable hoisting of ore through an underground winze and associated new infrastructure. This would result in reduced reliance on high-cost truck haulage by shortening the underground hauling distance, leading to improved energy efficiency, reduced mining costs, enhanced production profile and longer mine life. The Materials Handling System feasibility study is expected to be completed by mid-2016.
The 2015 acquisition of the
Systematic exploration and evaluation of the HG Young deposit (100%-owned), a high-grade exploration discovery near the
At
OPERATIONS REVIEW AND 2016 GUIDANCE
Pe?asquito (100%-owned)
At Pe?asquito in
As detailed in the life-of-mine plan, 2016 production at Pe?asquito will decrease versus 2015 as a result of mining in a lower-grade portion of the pit. Full-year 2016 gold production is expected to be between 520,000 and 580,000 ounces. On a gold equivalent basis8, production is expected to total between 1.3 million and 1.45 million ounces. Consistent with the life-of-mine plan, gold grades are expected to moderate over the next three years and increase again in 2019 as mining reaches the deeper portion of Phase 6 of the Penasco Pit. Construction of the Northern Well Field ("NWF") project resumed during the fourth quarter of 2015 following prior suspension of construction as a result of an illegal blockade by a local community. The NWF project is expected to be completed in late-2016. Contingency plans remain in place to ensure water supply to the mine continues unimpeded until the NWF is fully operational.
Cerro Negro (100%-owned)
Following the declaration of commercial production on
At the
At
?l?onore (100%-owned)
?l?onore declared commercial production on
At
The focus at
Musselwhite (100%-owned)
At Musselwhite in
Los Filos (100% owned)
Gold production at Los Filos during the fourth quarter was 74,400 ounces at an all-in sustaining cost of
Consistent with
Mine-by-mine actual 2015 gold production and forecast 2016 gold production ranges are as follows:
Mine |
2015 Production |
2016 Forecast |
Pe?asquito |
860,300 |
520,000 – 580,000 |
Cerro Negro |
507,400 |
475,000 – 525,000 |
Pueblo Viejo (40%) |
381,700 |
400,000 – 440,000 |
Red Lake |
375,700 |
300,000 – 330,000 |
?l?onore |
268,100 |
250,000 – 280,000 |
Porcupine |
274,300 |
250,000 – 275,000 |
Mine |
2015 Production |
2016 Forecast |
Musselwhite |
270,300 |
240,000 – 260,000 |
Other |
526,600 |
380,000 – 440,000 |
Total |
3,464,400 |
2,800,000 – 3,100,000 |
Financial Guidance
Total cash costs on a by-product basis are expected to be between
Company-wide exploration expenditures in 2016 are expected to total approximately
Three-Year Forecast
Year-by-year gold production are forecast as follows:
Year |
Forecast Gold Production |
2016 |
2.8 million to 3.1 million ounces |
2017 |
2.8 million to 3.1 million ounces |
2018 |
2.8 million to 3.1 million ounces |
Average all-in sustaining cash costs are forecast at
Price and foreign exchange rate assumptions used to forecast total cash costs and gold equivalent calculation include:
2016 |
2017 |
2018 | |
Gold (oz) |
\\$1,100 |
\\$1,100 |
\\$1,100 |
Silver (oz) |
\\$15.00 |
\\$15.00 |
\\$16.50 |
Copper (lb) |
\\$2.53 |
\\$2.61 |
\\$2.75 |
Zinc (lb) |
\\$0.80 |
\\$0.95 |
\\$0.95 |
Lead (lb) |
\\$0.80 |
\\$0.85 |
\\$0.90 |
Foreign exchange (respectively to the US\\$) |
|||
- Canadian dollar |
\\$1.30 |
1.30 |
\\$1.20 |
- Mexican peso |
16.00 |
16.00 |
14.50 |
2015 RESERVES AND RESOURCES
Total measured and indicated gold mineral resources for the Company increased by 1.63 million ounces to 37.8 million ounces. In addition, the Company has inferred gold resources of 18 million ounces.
For additional information on the 2015 and 2014 mineral reserves and mineral resources ("MRMR") refer to the MRMR tables set forth below and available at www.goldcorp.com.
The following summary accounts for the changes in proven and probable gold mineral reserve ounces year over year:
Proven and probable reserves as of January 1, 2015 |
49.6 moz |
Mined ounces depleted during 2015 |
(4.5 moz) |
Changes from business transactions1 |
(2.0 moz) |
Net discovered ounces and converted resources during 2015 |
5.9 moz |
Net changes due to economics and engineering design |
(8.3 moz) |
Proven and probable reserves as of December 31, 2015 |
40.7 moz2 |
1 |
Business transactions include the disposition of Dee and Project Corridor; while gold reserve ounces decreased as a result of the Project Corridor transaction, copper reserves increased, with Goldcorp's overall gold equivalent ounces increasing by 2% |
Focused
Reserves Highlights:
At Cerro Negro, proven and probable gold mineral reserves declined 11.5% to 4.66 million ounces while the measured and indicated gold mineral resource at Cerro Negro increased by 97%. The 2015 drilling program was successful in expanding reserves and resources at the Marianas vein complex, particularly at the newly discovered
Emilia Vein. The 2016 drilling program will focus on conversion of Cerro Negro's growing gold resource and on expansion of two newly-discovered ore shoots within the Marianas vein complex.
At ?l?onore, a successful 2015 drilling program targeting the conversion of resources to reserves in the centre and southern portion of the deposit contributed to a 7.7% increase in proven and probable gold mineral reserves to 5.35 million ounces and extended the deposit at depth, which remains open including the core area. Positive results from drilling in the 494 zone (Northern portion) continue to improve the confidence level regarding the size and the importance of this structure. Drilling in 2016 will continue to target the 494 zone for reserve replacement and test the deep projection of the centre and southern ore bodies and the 494 zone.
At
Musselwhite 2015 proven and probable gold mineral reserves totaled 1.72 million ounces compared to 1.66 million ounces at the end of 2014. Successful exploration efforts led to reserve growth in the PQ Deeps and Upper Lynx areas. A key target of 2016 exploration efforts will be extending the West Limb, where six mineralized horizons have been established. Exploration in 2016 will also follow-up on the Upper Lynx zone where two mineral horizons are both open to the north for further expansion.
At Pe?asquito, proven and probable gold mineral reserves declined 3.5% to 10.17 million ounces. The decrease was primarily a result of mining depletion, partially offset by positive remodeling of the deposit with adjustments incorporating new drill data. The exploration program during 2016 will focus on regional targets
At
At Los Filos, proven and probable gold mineral reserves declined 78% to 1.46 million ounces as a result of some of the future pushbacks at Los Filos and Bermejal pits no longer being economic at an
Reserves and Resources Tables
GOLDCORP INC GOLD AND SILVER RESERVES AND RESOURCES SUMMARY TABLE | ||||
As of December 31, 2015 |
As of December 31, 2014 | |||
Reserves |
Contained Gold (Moz) |
Contained Silver (Moz) |
Contained Gold (Moz) |
Contained Silver (Moz) |
Proven |
19.4 |
478.5 |
18.7 |
440.5 |
Probable |
21.3 |
226.1 |
30.9 |
348.1 |
Proven & Probable |
40.7 |
704.6 |
49.6 |
788.5 |
Resources |
||||
Measured |
6.7 |
126.8 |
6.0 |
136.1 |
Indicated |
31.1 |
351.5 |
30.2 |
474.0 |
Measured & Indicated |
37.8 |
478.3 |
36.2 |
610.1 |
Inferred |
18.4 |
68.0 |
24.0 |
85.7 |
GOLDCORP INC PROVEN AND PROBABLE RESERVES (1)(4)(5) Based on attributable ounces | |||||
GOLD |
As of December 31 | ||||
2015 |
2014 | ||||
Mt |
Au g/t |
Moz |
Moz | ||
Pe?asquito Mill |
Mexico |
586.68 |
0.52 |
9.87 |
9.70 |
Pueblo Viejo (40.0%) |
Dominican Republic |
62.58 |
2.97 |
5.97 |
6.21 |
?l?onore |
Canada |
28.32 |
5.87 |
5.35 |
4.97 |
Cerro Negro |
Argentina |
15.02 |
9.64 |
4.66 |
5.26 |
El Morro (50.0%) |
Chile |
299.53 |
0.46 |
4.46 |
6.24 |
Porcupine |
Canada |
43.82 |
1.51 |
2.13 |
2.98 |
Red Lake |
Canada |
7.10 |
9.10 |
2.08 |
2.06 |
Musselwhite |
Canada |
7.88 |
6.80 |
1.72 |
1.66 |
Camino Rojo |
Mexico |
66.13 |
0.76 |
1.62 |
1.85 |
Los Filos |
Mexico |
40.50 |
1.12 |
1.46 |
6.77 |
Borden |
Canada |
4.17 |
6.38 |
0.86 |
- |
Pe?asquito Heap Leach |
Mexico |
21.78 |
0.43 |
0.30 |
0.85 |
Marlin |
Guatemala |
0.81 |
5.07 |
0.13 |
0.31 |
Alumbrera (37.5%) |
Argentina |
10.95 |
0.35 |
0.12 |
0.55 |
Dee (40.0%) |
United States |
- |
- |
- |
0.16 |
TOTAL GOLD |
1,195.27 |
1.06 |
40.73 |
49.58 | |
SILVER |
Mt |
Ag g/t |
Moz |
Moz | |
Pe?asquito Mill |
Mexico |
586.68 |
30.04 |
566.55 |
529.65 |
Pueblo Viejo (40.0%) |
Dominican Republic |
62.58 |
17.94 |
36.10 |
38.89 |
Cerro Negro |
Argentina |
15.02 |
74.69 |
36.07 |
43.63 |
Camino Rojo |
Mexico |
66.13 |
15.22 |
32.37 |
37.49 |
Pe?asquito Heap Leach |
Mexico |
21.78 |
22.00 |
15.41 |
81.52 |
Los Filos |
Mexico |
40.50 |
8.10 |
10.55 |
41.11 |
Marlin |
Guatemala |
0.81 |
290.21 |
7.54 |
16.00 |
Dee (40.0%) |
United States |
- |
- |
- |
0.24 |
TOTAL SILVER |
793.50 |
27.62 |
704.59 |
788.53 | |
COPPER |
Mt |
% Cu |
Mlbs |
Mlbs | |
Relincho (50.0%) |
Chile |
619.57 |
0.37 |
5,087 |
- |
El Morro (50.0%) |
Chile |
299.53 |
0.49 |
3,251 |
4,552 (70.0%) |
Pueblo Viejo (40.0%) |
Dominican Republic |
62.58 |
0.09 |
130 |
142 |
Alumbrera (37.5%) |
Argentina |
10.95 |
0.34 |
83 |
406 |
TOTAL COPPER |
992.63 |
0.39 |
8,552 |
5,100 | |
LEAD |
Mt |
% Pb |
Mlbs |
Mlbs | |
Pe?asquito Mill |
Mexico |
586.68 |
0.29 |
3,701.26 |
3,757 |
TOTAL LEAD |
586.68 |
0.29 |
3,701.26 |
3,757 | |
ZINC |
Mt |
% Zn |
Mlbs |
Mlbs | |
Pe?asquito Mill |
Mexico |
586.68 |
0.69 |
8,885.91 |
9,081 |
TOTAL ZINC |
586.68 |
0.69 |
8,885.91 |
9,081 | |
MOLYBDENUM |
Mt |
% Mo |
Mlbs |
Mlbs | |
Relincho (50.0%) |
Chile |
619.57 |
0.017 |
238.90 |
- |
TOTAL MOLYBDENUM |
619.57 |
0.017 |
238.90 |
- |
GOLDCORP INC MEASURED AND INDICATED RESOURCES (1)(2)(3)(4)(6) | |||||
Based on attributable ounces | |||||
GOLD |
As of December 31 | ||||
2015 |
2014 | ||||
Mt |
Au g/t |
Moz |
Moz | ||
Los Filos |
Mexico |
357.88 |
0.84 |
9.65 |
4.13 |
Camino Rojo |
Mexico |
234.24 |
1.00 |
7.53 |
6.20 |
Pueblo Viejo (40.0%) |
Dominican Republic |
65.25 |
2.46 |
5.15 |
4.20 |
Porcupine |
Canada |
103.00 |
1.39 |
4.59 |
7.61 |
Red Lake |
Canada |
3.71 |
19.02 |
2.27 |
2.34 |
Pe?asquito Mill |
Mexico |
245.33 |
0.28 |
2.20 |
4.50 |
Cerro Negro |
Argentina |
6.88 |
5.78 |
1.28 |
0.65 |
Cerro Blanco |
Guatemala |
2.05 |
12.69 |
0.84 |
1.27 |
?l?onore |
Canada |
4.58 |
5.49 |
0.81 |
1.06 |
Alumbrera (37.5%) |
Argentina |
69.30 |
0.35 |
0.78 |
- |
Noche Buena |
Mexico |
52.88 |
0.37 |
0.63 |
0.96 |
El Morro (50.0%) |
Chile |
46.18 |
0.41 |
0.61 |
0.85 (70%) |
Borden |
Canada |
2.61 |
5.81 |
0.49 |
- |
Musselwhite |
Canada |
1.83 |
6.00 |
0.35 |
0.18 |
San Nicolas (21.0%) |
Mexico |
19.26 |
0.46 |
0.28 |
0.28 |
Pe?asquito Heap Leach |
Mexico |
47.54 |
0.17 |
0.26 |
0.77 |
Marlin |
Guatemala |
0.49 |
4.26 |
0.07 |
0.09 |
Dee (40.0%) |
United States |
0.86 | |||
El Sauzal |
Mexico |
0.21 | |||
TOTAL GOLD |
1,263.01 |
0.93 |
37.78 |
36.15 | |
SILVER |
Mt |
Ag g/t |
Moz |
Moz | |
Pe?asquito Mill |
Mexico |
245.33 |
26.90 |
212.15 |
369.57 |
Los Filos |
Mexico |
357.88 |
7.62 |
87.63 |
30.91 |
Camino Rojo |
Mexico |
234.24 |
8.86 |
66.70 |
52.46 |
Pueblo Viejo (40.0%) |
Dominican Republic |
65.25 |
14.19 |
29.77 |
24.45 |
Pe?asquito Heap Leach |
Mexico |
47.54 |
19.26 |
29.45 |
64.45 |
Noche Buena |
Mexico |
52.88 |
12.47 |
21.19 |
32.44 |
San Nicolas (21.0%) |
Mexico |
19.26 |
26.70 |
16.53 |
16.53 |
Cerro Negro |
Argentina |
6.88 |
41.14 |
9.09 |
5.59 |
Marlin |
Guatemala |
0.49 |
198.96 |
3.12 |
3.47 |
Cerro Blanco |
Guatemala |
2.05 |
40.13 |
2.64 |
5.83 |
Dee (40.0%) |
United States |
4.39 | |||
TOTAL SILVER |
1,031.79 |
14.42 |
478.28 |
610.11 | |
COPPER |
Mt |
% Cu |
Mlbs |
Mlbs | |
Relincho (50.0%) |
Chile |
198.50 |
0.32 |
1,421 |
- |
San Nicolas (21.0%) |
Mexico |
19.26 |
1.24 |
527 |
527 |
El Morro (50.0%) |
Chile |
46.18 |
0.42 |
427 |
597 (70%) |
Alumbrera |
Argentina |
69.30 |
0.22 |
340 |
- |
Pueblo Viejo (40.0%) |
Dominican Republic |
65.25 |
0.08 |
119 |
93 |
TOTAL COPPER |
398.49 |
0.32 |
2,834 |
1,216 | |
LEAD |
Mt |
% Pb |
Mlbs |
Mlbs | |
Pe?asquito Mill |
Mexico |
245.33 |
0.24 |
1,296.55 |
2,395 |
Camino Rojo |
Mexico |
215.85 |
0.06 |
276.59 |
388 |
TOTAL LEAD |
461.18 |
0.15 |
1,573.14 |
2,784 | |
ZINC |
Mt |
% Zn |
Mlbs |
Mlbs | |
Pe?asquito Mill |
Mexico |
245.33 |
0.59 |
3,175 |
5,379 |
Camino Rojo |
Mexico |
215.85 |
0.19 |
914 |
1,224 |
San Nicolas (21.0%) |
Mexico |
19.26 |
1.68 |
713 |
713 |
TOTAL ZINC |
480.44 |
0.45 |
4,802 |
7,316 | |
MOLYBDENUM |
Mt |
% Mo |
Mlbs |
Mlbs | |
Relincho (50.0%) |
Chile |
198.50 |
0.011 |
48.25 |
- |
TOTAL MOLYBDENUM |
198.50 |
0.011 |
48.25 |
- |
GOLDCORP INC INFERRED RESOURCES (1)(2)(3)(4)(6)
Based on attributable ounces | |||||
GOLD |
As of December 31 | ||||
2015 |
2014 | ||||
Mt |
Au g/t |
Moz |
Moz | ||
Los Filos |
Mexico |
141.04 |
0.80 |
3.62 |
4.64 |
El Morro (50.0%) |
Chile |
339.03 |
0.30 |
3.23 |
4.52 (70%) |
?l?onore |
Canada |
9.97 |
7.11 |
2.28 |
2.80 |
Red Lake |
Canada |
3.45 |
19.86 |
2.20 |
1.89 |
Cochenour |
Canada |
4.16 |
16.36 |
2.19 |
3.45 |
Porcupine |
Canada |
13.85 |
3.69 |
1.64 |
1.56 |
Musselwhite |
Canada |
5.93 |
5.82 |
1.11 |
1.27 |
Cerro Negro |
Argentina |
2.17 |
7.19 |
0.50 |
0.32 |
Camino Rojo |
Mexico |
17.38 |
0.84 |
0.47 |
2.17 |
Borden |
Canada |
2.09 |
5.49 |
0.37 |
- |
Alumbrera (37.5%) |
Argentina |
22.50 |
0.33 |
0.24 |
- |
Cerro Blanco |
Guatemala |
0.75 |
9.34 |
0.23 |
0.67 |
Pe?asquito Mill |
Mexico |
19.49 |
0.30 |
0.19 |
0.08 |
Pueblo Viejo (40.0%) |
Dominican Republic |
1.56 |
1.96 |
0.10 |
0.11 |
Noche Buena |
Mexico |
4.30 |
0.22 |
0.03 |
0.24 |
San Nicolas (21.0%) |
Mexico |
2.28 |
0.26 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
Pe?asquito Heap Leach |
Mexico |
0.57 |
0.31 |
0.01 |
0.15 |
Marlin |
Guatemala |
0.06 |
5.93 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
Dee (40.0%) |
United States |
0.08 | |||
TOTAL GOLD |
590.55 |
0.97 |
18.42 |
23.97 | |
SILVER |
Mt |
Ag g/t |
Moz |
Moz | |
Los Filos |
Mexico |
141.04 |
9.18 |
41.64 |
35.67 |
Pe?asquito Mill |
Mexico |
19.49 |
20.64 |
12.93 |
10.93 |
Camino Rojo |
Mexico |
17.38 |
9.41 |
5.26 |
12.28 |
Cerro Negro |
Argentina |
2.17 |
44.68 |
3.11 |
1.86 |
San Nicolas (21.0%) |
Mexico |
2.28 |
17.40 |
1.27 |
1.27 |
Noche Buena |
Mexico |
4.30 |
8.80 |
1.22 |
7.91 |
Cerro Blanco |
Guatemala |
0.75 |
43.61 |
1.06 |
2.59 |
Pueblo Viejo (40.0%) |
Dominican Republic |
1.56 |
13.93 |
0.70 |
0.91 |
Marlin |
Guatemala |
0.06 |
268.27 |
0.54 |
1.08 |
Pe?asquito Heap Leach |
Mexico |
0.57 |
15.49 |
0.28 |
10.78 |
Dee (40.0%) |
United States |
- |
- |
- |
0.43 |
TOTAL SILVER |
189.58 |
11.16 |
68.01 |
85.70 | |
COPPER |
Mt |
% Cu |
Mlbs |
Mlbs | |
El Morro (50.0%) |
Chile |
339.03 |
0.35 |
2,595 |
3,663 (70.0%) |
Relincho (50.0%) |
Chile |
305.41 |
0.38 |
2,550 |
- |
Alumbrera (37.50%) |
Argentina |
22.50 |
0.14 |
70 |
- |
San Nicolas (21.0%) |
Mexico |
2.28 |
1.24 |
62.25 |
62 |
Pueblo Viejo (40.0%) |
Dominican Republic |
1.56 |
0.04 |
1.43 |
1 |
TOTAL COPPER |
670.78 |
0.36 |
5,278.54 |
3,696 | |
LEAD |
Mt |
% Pb |
Mlbs |
Mlbs | |
Pe?asquito Mill |
Mexico |
19.49 |
0.25 |
107.28 |
93 |
Camino Rojo |
Mexico |
17.38 |
0.04 |
15.72 |
51 |
TOTAL LEAD |
36.86 |
0.15 |
123.00 |
143 | |
ZINC |
Mt |
% Zn |
Mlbs |
Mlbs | |
Pe?asquito Mill |
Mexico |
19.49 |
0.36 |
155 |
186 |
Camino Rojo |
Mexico |
17.38 |
0.13 |
51 |
315 |
San Nicolas (21.0%) |
Mexico |
2.28 |
0.97 |
49 |
49 |
TOTAL ZINC |
39.14 |
0.30 |
255 |
550 | |
MOLYBDENUM |
Mt |
% Mo |
Mlbs |
Mlbs | |
Relincho (50.0%) |
Chile |
305.41 |
0.013 |
88.20 |
- |
TOTAL MOLYBDENUM |
305.41 |
0.013 |
88.20 |
- |
*Numbers may not add up due to rounding
**For additional information on the 2015 and 2014 mineral reserves and mineral resources ("MRMR") refer to the MRMR tables that can be found at www.goldcorp.com
Goldcorp December 31, 2015 Reserve and Resource Reporting Notes: | |||
1 |
All Mineral Reserves or Ore Reserves have been estimated in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards or the JORC Code. The JORC Code has been accepted for current disclosure rules in Canada under NI 43-101. Subject to note 4 below, all Mineral Reserves, Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources set out in the tables above or elsewhere in this release have been reviewed and approved by Gil Lawson, P.Eng., Vice President of Geology and Mine Planning, Goldcorp, who is a qualified person as defined under National Instrument 43-101. | ||
2 |
All Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves. | ||
3 |
Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. | ||
4 |
Reserves and Resources are reported as of December 31, 2015, with the following conditions or exceptions: | ||
(i) (ii) (iii) |
Reserves and Resources for Pueblo Viejo are as per information provided by Barrick Gold Corporation. Reserves and Resources for Relincho and San Nicolas are as per information provided by Teck Resources Limited. Reserves and Resources for Alumbrera are as per information provided by Glencore plc. | ||
5 |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using appropriate recovery rates and US\\$ commodity prices of \\$1,100 per ounce of gold, \\$16.50 per ounce of silver, \\$2.75 per pound of copper, \\$0.90 per pound of lead, and \\$0.95 per pound of zinc, unless otherwise noted below: | ||
(i) |
Alumbrera |
\\$1,095/oz gold, \\$2.54/lb copper | |
(ii) |
El Morro |
\\$1,200/oz gold | |
(iii) |
Pueblo Viejo |
\\$1,000/oz for the next five years, and a long-term gold price of \\$1,200 per ounce from 2021 onwards, \\$16.50/oz silver, \\$3.00/lb copper | |
(iv) |
Relincho |
\\$13.70/lb molybdenum, \\$2.80/lb copper | |
6 |
Mineral Resources are estimated using US\\$ commodity prices of \\$1,300 per ounce of gold, \\$19 per ounce of silver, \\$3.25 per pound of copper, \\$1.00 per pound of lead, and \\$1.00 per pound of zinc, unless otherwise noted below; | ||
(i) |
Alumbrera |
\\$1,100/oz gold, \\$2.95/lb copper | |
(ii) |
El Morro |
\\$1,200/oz gold, \\$2.75/lb copper | |
(iii) |
Pueblo Viejo |
\\$1,300/oz gold, \\$17.50/oz silver, \\$3.25/lb copper | |
(iv) |
Relincho |
\\$13.70/lb molybdenum, \\$2.80/lb copper | |
(v) |
San Nicolas |
\\$1,275/oz gold, \\$22.50/oz silver, \\$2.75/lb copper, \\$1.00/lb zinc | |
Cautionary Note Regarding Reserves and Resources:
Scientific and technical information contained in this news release was reviewed and approved by
Gil Lawson, P.Eng., Vice-President, Geology and Mine Planning for
Cautionary Note to
In addition, the terms "Mineral Resource", "Measured Mineral Resource", "Indicated Mineral Resource" and "Inferred Mineral Resource" are defined in and required to be disclosed by NI 43-101; however, these terms are not defined terms under SEC Industry Guide 7 and are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the
Accordingly, information contained in this press release containing descriptions of the Company's mineral deposits may not be comparable to similar information made public by
This release should be read in conjunction with
Conference Call and Webcast
Date: |
Friday, February 26, 2016 |
Time: |
10:00 a.m. (PST) |
Webcast: |
|
Dial-in: |
1-800-355-4959 (toll-free) or 1-416-340-2216 (outside Canada and the US) |
Replay: |
1-800-408-3053 (toll-free) or 1-905-694-9451 (outside Canada and the US) |
Passcode: |
5644646 |
The conference call replay will be archived on the website until
1. |
The Company has included non-GAAP performance measures on an attributable basis (Goldcorp share) throughout this document. Attributable performance measures include the Company's mining operations and projects and the Company's share from Alumbrera and Pueblo Viejo. The Company believes that disclosing certain performance measures on an attributable basis is a more accurate measurement of the Company's operating and economic performance and reflects the Company's view of its core mining operations. The Company believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, the Company and certain investors use this information to evaluate the Company's performance and ability to generate cash flow. However these performance measures do not have any standardized meaning. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The amounts disclosed also include the results of the Company's discontinued operation Wharf. Refer to note 10 of the 2015 Financial Statements a reconciliation of adjusted revenues to reported revenues. |
2. |
Adjusted operating cash flows and adjusted operating cash flows per share are non-GAAP performance measures which comprises Goldcorp's share of operating cash flows before working capital changes and which the Company believes provides additional information about the Company's ability to generate cash flows from its mining operations. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. Refer to page 50 of the 2015 Annual MD&A for a reconciliation of adjusted operating cash flows to reported net cash provided by operating activities. |
3. |
Free cash flows is a non-GAAP performance measure which the Company believes, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, the Company and certain investors use to evaluate the Company's ability to generate cash flows. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. Free cash flows are calculated by deducting from net cash provided by operating activities, Goldcorp's share of expenditures on mining interests, deposits on mining interest expenditures and capitalized interest paid, and adding Goldcorp's share of net free cash provided by operating activities at Alumbrera, Pueblo Viejo and Project Corridor. Refer to page 51 of the 2015 Annual MD&A for a reconciliation of free cash flows to reported net cash provided by operating activities. |
4. |
Comprises certain non-cash, non-operating items which are excluded from adjusted net (loss) earnings for the three months ended December 31, 2015. Refer to page 49 of the 2015 Annual MD&A for the reconciliation of adjusted net (loss) earnings for the three months ended December 31, 2015. |
5. |
All-in sustaining cost is a non-GAAP performance measure that the Company believes more fully defines the total costs associated with producing gold. All-in sustaining costs include by-product cash costs, sustaining capital expenditures, corporate administrative expense, exploration and evaluation costs and reclamation cost accretion and amortization. As the measure seeks to reflect the full cost of gold production from current operations, new project capital is not included in the calculation. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The Company reports this measure on a sales basis. Refer to page 46 of the 2015 Annual MD&A for a reconciliation of all-in sustaining costs. |
6. |
The Company has included non-GAAP performance measures - total cash costs, by-product, per gold ounce, throughout this document. The Company reports total cash costs on a sales basis. In the gold mining industry, this is a common performance measure but does not have any standardized meaning. The Company follows the recommendations of the Gold Institute Production Cost Standard. The production cost standard developed by the Gold Institute remains the generally accepted standard of reporting cash costs of production by gold mining companies. In addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, the Company assesses this measure in a manner that isolates the impacts of gold production volumes, the by-product credits, and operating costs fluctuations such that the non-controllable and controllable variability is independently addressed. The Company uses total cash costs, by product, per gold ounce, to monitor its operating performance internally, including operating cash costs, as well as in its assessment of potential development projects and acquisition targets. The Company believes these measures provide investors and analysts with useful information about the Company's underlying cash costs of operations and the impact of by-product credits on the Company's cost structure and is a relevant metric used to understand the Company's operating profitability and ability to generate cash flow. When deriving the production costs associated with an ounce of gold, the Company includes by-product credits as the Company considers that the cost to produce the gold is reduced as a result of the by-product sales incidental to the gold production process, thereby allowing the Company's management and other stakeholders to assess the net costs of gold production. The Company believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, the Company and certain investors use this information to evaluate the Company's performance and ability to generate cash flow. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. Total cash costs on a by-product basis are calculated by deducting Goldcorp's share of by-product silver, copper, lead and zinc sales revenues from Goldcorp's share of production costs. |
Refer to page 44 of the 2015 Annual MD&A for a reconciliation of total cash costs to reported production | |
7. |
At December 31, 2015, the Company had \\$3.5 billion of liquidity, consisting of \\$0.4 billion of attributable cash & cash equivalents, \\$0.1 billion of money market investments, and \\$3.0 billion undrawn on its \\$3.0 billion revolving credit facility. At December 31, 2014, the Company had \\$1.9 billion of liquidity consisting of \\$0.6 billion of attributable cash & cash equivalents, \\$0.1 billion of money market investments, and \\$1.2 billion undrawn on its \\$2.0 billion revolving credit facility |
8. |
Gold equivalent ounces are calculated using the following assumptions: \\$1,100 per ounce for gold; by-product metal prices of \\$16.50 per ounce silver; \\$2.75 per pound copper; \\$0.95 per pound zinc; and \\$0.90 per pound lead. By-product metals are converted to gold equivalent ounces by multiplying by-product metal production with the associated by-product metal price and dividing it with the gold price. |
About
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This press release contains "forward-looking statements", within the meaning of Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the United States Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and "forward-looking information" under the provisions of applicable Canadian securities legislation, concerning the business, operations and financial performance and condition of
Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors that, if untrue, could cause the actual results, performances or achievements of
Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of
SUMMARIZED RESULTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOLLOW
SUMMARIZED RESULTS | |||||||
Three Months Ended | |||||||
December 31 | |||||||
Goldcorp's share (1) |
2015 |
2014 |
|||||
Revenues |
1,238 |
1,087 |
|||||
Gold produced (ounces) |
909,400 |
890,900 |
|||||
Gold sold (ounces) |
918,100 |
707,900 |
|||||
Silver produced (ounces) |
10,095,700 |
10,426,300 |
|||||
Silver sold (ounces) |
10,586,500 |
7,887,500 |
|||||
Copper produced (thousands of pounds) |
21,400 |
27,200 |
|||||
Copper sold (thousands of pounds) |
16,900 |
20,200 |
|||||
Lead produced (thousands of pounds) |
40,500 |
27,200 |
|||||
Lead sold (thousands of pounds) |
41,700 |
29,400 |
|||||
Zinc produced (thousands of pounds) |
89,300 |
68,900 |
|||||
Zinc sold (thousands of pounds) |
98,000 |
84,000 |
|||||
Average realized gold price (per ounce) |
\\$ |
1,098 |
\\$ |
1,203 |
|||
Average London spot gold price (per ounce) |
\\$ |
1,105 |
\\$ |
1,201 |
|||
Average realized silver price (per ounce) |
\\$ |
13.14 |
\\$ |
14.31 |
|||
Average London spot silver price (per ounce) |
\\$ |
14.76 |
\\$ |
16.47 |
|||
Average realized copper price (per pound) |
\\$ |
2.07 |
\\$ |
2.82 |
|||
Average London spot copper price (per pound) |
\\$ |
2.22 |
\\$ |
3.00 |
|||
Average realized lead price (per pound) |
\\$ |
0.79 |
\\$ |
0.83 |
|||
Average London spot lead price (per pound) |
\\$ |
0.76 |
\\$ |
0.91 |
|||
Average realized zinc price (per pound) |
\\$ |
0.71 |
\\$ |
0.99 |
|||
Average London spot zinc price (per pound) |
\\$ |
0.73 |
\\$ |
1.01 |
|||
Total cash costs – by-product (per gold ounce) |
\\$ |
687 |
\\$ |
589 |
|||
Total cash costs – co-product (per gold ounce) |
\\$ |
739 |
\\$ |
669 |
|||
All-in sustaining costs (per gold ounce) |
\\$ |
977 |
\\$ |
1,035 |
|||
All-in costs (per gold ounce) |
\\$ |
983 |
\\$ |
1,544 |
|||
Production Data: |
|||||||
Red Lake mines: |
Tonnes of ore milled |
200,700 |
186,900 |
||||
Average mill head grade (grams per tonne) |
15.57 |
21.52 |
|||||
Gold ounces produced |
99,900 |
130,300 |
|||||
Total cash costs – by-product (per ounce) |
\\$ |
610 |
\\$ |
493 |
|||
All-in sustaining costs (per ounce) |
\\$ |
959 |
\\$ |
809 |
|||
Porcupine mines: |
Tonnes of ore milled |
1,117,700 |
1,094,100 |
||||
Average mill head grade (grams per tonne) |
2.43 |
2.82 |
|||||
Gold ounces produced |
74,900 |
90,400 |
|||||
Total cash costs – by-product (per ounce) |
\\$ |
769 |
\\$ |
591 |
|||
All-in sustaining costs (per ounce) |
\\$ |
1,031 |
\\$ |
857 |
|||
Musselwhite mine: |
Tonnes of ore milled |
314,300 |
312,000 |
||||
Average mill head grade (grams per tonne) |
7.95 |
7.46 |
|||||
Gold ounces produced |
81,200 |
73,100 |
|||||
Total cash costs – by-product (per ounce) |
527 |
619 |
|||||
All-in sustaining costs (per ounce) |
699 |
779 |
|||||
?l?onore mine: |
Tonnes of ore milled |
517,200 |
169,800 |
||||
Average mill head grade (grams per tonne) |
7.57 |
4.20 |
|||||
Gold ounces produced |
105,100 |
18,300 |
|||||
Total cash costs – by-product (per ounce) |
\\$ |
677 |
\\$ |
— |
|||
All-in sustaining costs (per ounce) |
\\$ |
761 |
\\$ |
— |
|||
Pe?asquito mines: |
Tonnes of ore mined |
9,849,700 |
10,016,400 |
||||
Tonnes of waste removed |
38,590,400 |
32,778,100 |
|||||
Tonnes of ore milled |
9,854,000 |
10,195,800 |
|||||
Average head grade (grams per tonne) – gold |
0.79 |
0.65 |
|||||
Average head grade (grams per tonne) – silver |
26.88 |
21.61 |
|||||
Average head grade (%) – lead |
0.27 |
0.19 |
|||||
Average head grade (%) – zinc |
0.63 |
0.52 |
|||||
Gold ounces produced |
169,900 |
141,100 |
|||||
Silver ounces produced |
6,459,000 |
5,834,700 |
|||||
Lead (thousands of pounds) produced |
40,500 |
27,200 |
|||||
Zinc (thousands of pounds) produced |
89,300 |
68,900 |
|||||
Total cash costs – by-product (per ounce) |
\\$ |
451 |
\\$ |
728 |
|||
Total cash costs – co-product (per ounce of gold) |
\\$ |
612 |
\\$ |
820 |
|||
All-in sustaining costs (per ounce) |
\\$ |
687 |
\\$ |
1,472 |
|||
Los Filos mines: |
Tonnes of ore mined |
5,481,800 |
7,184,100 |
||||
Tonnes of waste removed |
8,368,000 |
9,685,000 |
|||||
Tonnes of ore processed |
5,467,700 |
7,227,200 |
|||||
Average grade processed (grams per tonne) |
0.78 |
0.53 |
|||||
Gold ounces produced |
74,400 |
65,900 |
|||||
Total cash costs – by-product (per ounce) |
\\$ |
2,004 |
\\$ |
1,194 |
|||
All-in sustaining costs (per ounce) |
\\$ |
2,131 |
\\$ |
1,369 |
|||
Marlin mine: |
Tonnes of ore milled |
309,800 |
490,800 |
||||
Average mill head grade (grams per tonne) – gold |
4.12 |
3.41 |
|||||
Average mill head grade (grams per tonne) – silver |
198 |
151 |
|||||
Gold ounces produced |
40,900 |
52,300 |
|||||
Silver ounces produced |
1,883,800 |
2,216,700 |
|||||
Total cash costs – by-product (per ounce) |
\\$ |
287 |
\\$ |
273 |
|||
Total cash costs – co-product (per ounce) |
\\$ |
563 |
\\$ |
569 |
|||
All-in sustaining costs (per ounce) |
\\$ |
787 |
\\$ |
703 |
|||
Cerro Negro mines: |
Tonnes of ore milled |
330,200 |
290,300 |
||||
Average mill head grade (grams per tonne) – gold |
15.34 |
15.15 |
|||||
Average mill head grade (grams per tonne) – silver |
163.6 |
288.7 |
|||||
Gold ounces produced |
147,800 |
133,100 |
|||||
Silver ounces produced |
1,489,400 |
1,929,800 |
|||||
Total cash costs – by-product (per ounce) |
\\$ |
577 |
— |
||||
Total cash costs – co-product (per ounce) |
\\$ |
627 |
— |
||||
All-in sustaining costs (per ounce) |
\\$ |
872 |
— |
||||
Alumbrera mine (37.5% share): |
Tonnes of ore mined |
3,116,700 |
2,600,000 |
||||
Tonnes of waste removed |
3,563,400 |
3,370,900 |
|||||
Tonnes of ore milled |
3,165,300 |
3,526,200 |
|||||
Average mill head grade (grams per tonne) – gold |
0.35 |
0.47 |
|||||
Average mill head grade (%) – copper |
0.36 |
0.39 |
|||||
Gold ounces produced |
25,800 |
41,700 |
|||||
Copper (thousands of pounds) produced |
21,300 |
27,200 |
|||||
Total cash costs – by-product (per gold ounce) |
\\$ |
1,028 |
\\$ |
(282) |
|||
Total cash costs – co-product (per gold ounce) |
\\$ |
813 |
\\$ |
512 |
|||
All-in sustaining costs (per gold ounce) |
\\$ |
1,274 |
\\$ |
89 |
|||
Pueblo Viejo mine (40% share): |
Tonnes of ore mined |
2,851,000 |
955,600 |
||||
Tonnes of waste removed |
1,324,100 |
2,568,800 |
|||||
Tonnes of ore processed |
546,300 |
725,200 |
|||||
Average grade (grams per tonne) – gold |
5.93 |
5.42 |
|||||
Average grade (grams per tonne) – silver |
27.1 |
35.0 |
|||||
Gold ounces produced |
89,500 |
117,900 |
|||||
Silver ounces produced |
263,500 |
445,100 |
|||||
Total cash costs – by-product (per gold ounce) |
\\$ |
502 |
\\$ |
477 |
|||
Total cash costs – co-product (per gold ounce) |
\\$ |
529 |
\\$ |
509 |
|||
All-in sustaining costs (per gold ounce) |
\\$ |
608 |
\\$ |
630 |
|||
Financial Data (including discontinued operations): | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
\\$ |
401 |
\\$ |
274 |
|||
Adjusted operating cash flows (Goldcorp's share) (2) |
\\$ |
339 |
\\$ |
337 |
|||
Adjusted operating cash flows per share (2) |
\\$ |
0.41 |
\\$ |
0.41 |
|||
Free cash flows |
\\$ |
239 |
\\$ |
(241) |
|||
Net loss attributable to shareholders of Goldcorp Inc. |
\\$ |
(4,271) |
\\$ |
(2,396) |
|||
Net loss per share – basic |
\\$ |
(5.14) |
\\$ |
(2.94) |
|||
Adjusted net (loss) earnings (3) |
\\$ |
(128) |
\\$ |
55 |
|||
Adjusted net (loss) earnings per share – basic (3) |
\\$ |
(0.15) |
\\$ |
0.07 |
|||
Weighted average shares outstanding (000's) |
830,238 |
813,792 |
INTERIM AND ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS | |||||
Three Months Ended December 31 |
Twelve Months Ended December 31 | ||||
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 | ||
Revenues |
\\$ 1,072 |
\\$ 835 |
\\$ 4,375 |
\\$ 3,436 | |
Mine operating costs |
|||||
Production costs |
(662) |
(582) |
(2,580) |
(2,079) | |
Depreciation and depletion |
(421) |
(215) |
(1,493) |
(753) | |
(1,083) |
(797) |
(4,073) |
(2,832) | ||
(Loss) earnings from mine operations |
(11) |
38 |
302 |
604 | |
Exploration and evaluation costs |
(12) |
(12) |
(51) |
(41) | |
Share of net (loss) earnings of associates and joint venture |
(24) |
25 |
(1) |
156 | |
Impairment of mining interests and goodwill |
(4,906) |
(2,980) |
(4,906) |
(2,999) | |
Corporate administration |
(48) |
(59) |
(207) |
247 | |
Loss from operations, associates and joint venture |
(5,001) |
(2,988) |
(4,863) |
(2,527) | |
Gains (losses) on derivatives, net |
1 |
(34) |
(54) |
(40) | |
Gain on dilution of ownership interest in associate |
— |
— |
99 |
— | |
Gain on disposition of mining interests, net of transaction costs |
— |
— |
315 |
18 | |
Finance costs |
(31) |
(8) |
(135) |
(49) | |
Other (expenses) income |
(80) |
2 |
(50) |
(10) | |
Loss from continuing operations before taxes |
(5,111) |
(3,028) |
(4,688) |
(2,608) | |
Income tax recovery |
840 |
625 |
485 |
440 | |
Net loss from continuing operations |
(4,271) |
(2,403) |
(4,203) |
(2,168) | |
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
— |
7 |
46 |
9 | |
Net loss |
\\$ (4,271) |
\\$ (2,396) |
\\$ (4,157) |
\\$ (2,159) | |
Net loss from continuing operations attributable to: |
|||||
Shareholders of Goldcorp Inc. |
\\$ (4,271) |
\\$ (2,403) |
\\$ (4,204) |
\\$ (2,170) | |
Non-controlling interest |
— |
— |
1 |
2 | |
\\$ (4,271) |
\\$ (2,403) |
\\$ (4,203) |
\\$ (2,168) | ||
Net loss attributable to: |
|||||
Shareholders of Goldcorp Inc. |
\\$ (4,271) |
\\$ (2,396) |
\\$ (4,158) |
\\$ (2,161) | |
Non-controlling interest |
— |
— |
1 |
2 | |
\\$ (4,271) |
\\$ (2,396) |
\\$ (4,157) |
\\$ (2,159) | ||
Net loss per share from continuing operations |
|||||
Basic |
\\$ (5.14) |
\\$ (2.95) |
\\$ (5.08) |
\\$ (2.67) | |
Diluted |
(5.14) |
(2.95) |
(5.08) |
(2.67) | |
Net loss per share |
|||||
Basic |
\\$ (5.14) |
\\$ (2.94) |
\\$ (5.03) |
\\$ (2.66) | |
Diluted |
(5.14) |
(2.94) |
(5.03) |
(2.66) |
INTERIM AND ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | |||||
Three Months Ended December 31 |
Twelve Months Ended December 31 | ||||
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 | ||
Operating activities |
|||||
Net loss from continuing operations |
\\$ (4,271) |
\\$ (2,403) |
\\$ (4,203) |
\\$ (2,168) | |
Adjustments for: |
|||||
Dividends from associates |
— |
4 |
7 |
109 | |
Reclamation expenditures |
(8) |
(12) |
(57) |
(33) | |
Items not affecting cash: |
|||||
Write-down of inventories to net realizable value |
101 |
31 |
144 |
72 | |
Depreciation and depletion |
421 |
215 |
1,493 |
753 | |
Share of net loss (earnings) of associates and joint venture |
24 |
(25) |
1 |
(156) | |
Impairment of mining interests and goodwill |
4,906 |
2,980 |
4,906 |
2,999 | |
Share-based compensation |
10 |
13 |
54 |
72 | |
Unrealized (gains) loss on derivatives, net |
(29) |
26 |
(29) |
28 | |
Gain on dilution of ownership interest in an associate |
— |
— |
(99) |
— | |
Gain on disposition of mining interests, net of transaction costs |
— |
— |
(315) |
(18) | |
Revision of estimates and accretion of reclamation and closure cost obligations |
(54) |
61 |
(15) |
95 | |
Foreign exchange loss |
126 |
(12) |
130 |
8 | |
Deferred income tax recovery |
(914) |
(629) |
(791) |
(575) | |
Other |
26 |
10 |
25 |
2 | |
Change in working capital |
63 |
6 |
172 |
(206) | |
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
401 |
265 |
1,423 |
982 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities of discontinued operations |
— |
9 |
7 |
32 | |
Investing activities |
|||||
Acquisition of mining interests, net of cash acquired |
— |
— |
(43) |
— | |
Expenditures on mining interests |
(229) |
(473) |
(1,152) |
(1,882) | |
Deposits on mining interest expenditures |
(11) |
(34) |
(26) |
(139) | |
Return of capital investment in associate |
37 |
— |
112 |
— | |
Proceeds from disposition of mining interests, net of transaction costs |
— |
— |
788 |
193 | |
Interest paid |
(13) |
(33) |
(77) |
(101) | |
Purchases of money market investments and available-for-sale securities, net |
7 |
19 |
(26) |
(17) | |
Other |
— |
— |
(2) |
— | |
Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations |
(209) |
(521) |
(426) |
(1,946) | |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities of discontinued operations |
— |
(1) |
97 |
203 | |
Financing activities |
|||||
Debt borrowings, net of transaction costs |
205 |
235 |
205 |
1,223 | |
Debt repayments |
(209) |
(50) |
(223) |
(994) | |
Credit facility (repayments) drawdown, net |
— |
290 |
(840) |
840 | |
Payment of finance lease obligations |
(2) |
— |
(2) |
— | |
Dividends paid to shareholders |
(49) |
(122) |
(370) |
(488) | |
Common shares issued |
— |
1 |
20 |
5 | |
Other |
— |
— |
21 |
— | |
Acquisition of non-controlling interest |
(67) |
— |
(67) |
— | |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities of continuing operations |
(122) |
354 |
(1,256) |
586 | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(1) |
— |
(1) |
— | |
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
69 |
106 |
(156) |
(143) | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
257 |
376 |
482 |
625 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
\\$ 326 |
\\$ 482 |
\\$ 326 |
\\$ 482 |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | ||||||||
At December 31 |
At December 31 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
\\$ 326 |
\\$ 482 | ||||||
Money market investments |
57 |
53 | ||||||
Accounts receivable |
346 |
394 | ||||||
Inventories |
469 |
772 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable |
67 |
207 | ||||||
Assets held for sale |
— |
81 | ||||||
Other |
66 |
158 | ||||||
1,331 |
2,147 | |||||||
Mining interests |
||||||||
Owned by subsidiaries |
17,630 |
22,458 | ||||||
Investments in associates and joint venture |
1,839 |
2,087 | ||||||
19,469 |
24,545 | |||||||
Goodwill |
— |
479 | ||||||
Investments in securities |
51 |
43 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
50 |
26 | ||||||
Inventories |
255 |
249 | ||||||
Other |
272 |
377 | ||||||
Total assets |
\\$ 21,428 |
\\$ 27,866 | ||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
\\$ 680 |
\\$ 1,039 | ||||||
Debt |
212 |
150 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
104 |
45 | ||||||
Liabilities relating to assets held for sale |
— |
55 | ||||||
Other |
53 |
167 | ||||||
1,049 |
1,456 | |||||||
Deferred income taxes |
3,749 |
4,959 | ||||||
Debt |
2,476 |
3,442 | ||||||
Provisions |
775 |
671 | ||||||
Finance lease obligations |
267 |
21 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
161 |
80 | ||||||
Other |
103 |
62 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
8,580 |
10,691 | ||||||
Equity |
||||||||
Shareholders' equity |
||||||||
Common shares, stock options and restricted share units |
17,604 |
17,261 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(6) |
(5) | ||||||
Deficit |
(4,750) |
(296) | ||||||
12,848 |
16,960 | |||||||
Non-controlling interest |
— |
215 | ||||||
Total equity |
12,848 |
17,175 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
\\$ 21,428 |
\\$ 27,866 |
Êîììåíòàðèè