Water Reaction with Metal Oxides Opens Doors for Researchers
OREANDA-NEWS. August 13, 2014. A multi-institutional team has resolved a long-unanswered question about how 2 of the world’s most common substances interact.
In a paper published recently in the journal Nature Communications, Manos Mavrikakis, professor of chemical and biological engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and his collaborators report fundamental discoveries about how water reacts with metal oxides. The paper opens doors for greater understanding and control of chemical reactions in fields ranging from catalysis to geochemistry and atmospheric chemistry.
“These metal oxide materials are everywhere, and water is everywhere,” Mavrikakis says. “It would be nice to see how something so abundant as water interacts with materials that are accelerating chemical reactions.”
These reactions play a huge role in the catalysis-driven creation of common chemical platforms such as methanol, which is produced on the order of 10 million tons per year as raw material for chemicals production and for uses like fuel. “Ninety percent of all catalytic processes use metal oxides as a support,” Mavrikakis says. “Therefore, all of the reactions including water as an impurity or reactant or product would be affected by the insights developed.”
Chemists understand how water interacts with many non-oxide metals, which are very homogeneous. Metal oxides are trickier: an occasional oxygen atom is missing, causing what Mavrikakis calls “oxygen defects.” When water meets with one of those defects, it forms 2 adjacent hydroxyls — a stable compound comprised of one oxygen atom and one hydrogen atom.
Mavrikakis, assistant scientist Guowen Peng and Ph.D. student Carrie Farberow, along with researchers at Aarhus University in Denmark and Lund University in Sweden, investigated how hydroxyls affect water molecules around them, and how that differs from water molecules contacting a pristine metal oxide surface.
The Aarhus researchers generated data on the reactions using scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). The Wisconsin researchers then subjected the STM images to quantum mechanical analysis that decoded the resulting chemical structures, defining which atom is which. “If you don’t have the component of the work that we provided, there is no way that you can tell from STM alone what the atomic-scale structure of the water is when absorbed on various surfaces” Mavrikakis says.
The project yielded 2 dramatically different pictures of water-metal oxide reactions.
“On a smooth surface, you form amorphous ne2rks of water molecules, whereas on a hydroxylated surface, there are much more structured, well-ordered domains of water molecules,” Mavrikakis says.
In the latter case, the researchers realized that hydroxyl behaves as a sort of anchor, setting the template for a tidy hexameric ring of water molecules attracted to the metal’s surface.
Mavrikakis’ next step is to examine how these differing structures react with other molecules, and to use the research to improve catalysis. He sees many possibilities outside his own field.
“Maybe others might be inspired and look at the geochemistry or atmospheric chemistry implications, such as how these water cluster structures on atmospheric dust nanoparticles could affect cloud formation, rain and acid rain,” Mavrikakis says.
Other researchers might also look at whether other molecules exhibit similar behavior when they come into contact with metal oxides, he adds.
“It opens the doors to using hydrogen bonds to make surfaces hydrophilic, or attracted to water, and to (template) these surfaces for the selective absorption of other molecules possessing fundamental similarities to water,” Mavrikakis says. “Because catalysis is at the heart of engineering chemical reactions, this is also very fundamental for atomic-scale chemical reaction engineering.”
While the research fills part of the foundation of chemistry, it also owes a great deal to state-of-the-art research technology.
“The size and nature of the calculations we had to do probably were not feasible until maybe 4 or 5 years ago, and the spatial and temporal resolution of scanning tunneling microscopy was not there,” Mavrikakis says. “So it’s advances in the methods that allow for this new information to be born.”
Комментарии