BoL Released Economic Outlook for Lithuania
OREANDA-NEWS. On 14 August 2009 was announced, that the first GDP estimate of the second quarter, announced by the Department of Statistics, revealed a very abrupt 22.4 per cent drop of GDP. According to this data, the economic contraction did not slacken within the second quarter. However, this allows expecting substantially softer quarterly changes in the second half of 2009. The presumption that the real economic activity is higher due to the growth of the shadow economy also should not be rejected; however, it is currently difficult to quantify this. Moreover, in the autumn of 2009, as annually, the Department of Statistics will review data of the recent years, which may cause substantial changes in the GDP growth. The data dynamics permits to expect a smaller adjusted GDP for 2008, meaning also a lower than currently announced GDP drop and more optimistic projections of economic indicators.
The economic downturn in
Compared to the projections of May, changes in the real sector indicators are expected to be more sizeable. However, taking into account the intense GDP drop in the first half of
The projected economic downturn in 2009, bringing
The projected further 5.2 per cent fall of
Compared to May, assessments of price developments remain broadly unchanged - in 2009-2010 inflation will account for 3.9 and -2.0 per cent, respectively. The impact of VAT rate increase from September should be compensated by cheapening of electricity and natural gas, reduction of the excise duty on diesel fuel, and heating energy price changes due to cheaper natural gas. Higher prices of electricity from 2010 will push inflation up; however, this effect should be outweighed by the general deflationary trends related to a strong economic downturn and decreasing wages.
An alternative scenario envisaging a slower economic activity stabilisation compared to that in the baseline scenario should not be rejected. Key risk factors that may entail worse projections are persisting uncertainty in terms of a further economic development of foreign countries, a more profound decrease in private consumption and investments, and a higher unemployment rate. According to this scenario, GDP might shrink up to 2 percentage points more.
A steeper private consumption drop may be induced by unfavourable labour market trends and a curtailing loan flow. A more intensive unemployment growth and more robust wage decline should drive stronger changes in disposable income of the population. A negative impact on household expenditures is also caused by changed trends in the flow of loans for house purchase and consumer loans. Tighter lending conditions, expectations related with a further fall of real estate prices, and a substantially more circumspect assessment of future income contributed to a shrinking portfolio of household loans - in the first quarter of this year, households repaid more loans than took new ones. In the case of a slower economic activity stabilisation scenario, pessimistic expectations may weaken the demand for loans and stimulate households to limit expenditures more than currently forecasted.
If the assumption of a robust external demand recovery does not fulfil, a stronger downturn than that envisaged in the baseline scenario is possible. At the beginning of the year, given strong uncertainty of economic development prospects, investments into the means of production experienced a particularly intensive drop. A protracted recovery in global markets would contribute to a further decrease of these investments. Investments are also limited by unfavourable borrowing conditions, while a fallen share of profitable enterprises demonstrates fewer opportunities for enterprises to finance investments by their own funds. A less favourable development of the global economy would in turn entail a subsequent recovery in international financial markets and would allow planning of a stronger than currently projected curtailment in the flow of the loans to enterprises in Lithuania.
A deeper contraction in domestic and external demand would also change the assessment of the foreign trade development. Imports and exports this year would drop more than envisaged in the baseline scenario. Next year changes of these indicators will be softer - the growth of exports would be encouraged by a subsequent start of the recovery of
Комментарии